| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
administrator Developer


Joined: 24 Jul 2004 Posts: 4750 Location: King William, VA
|
Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2012 12:38 am Post subject: Newsman Pro 3.0.7.1 Beta Released |
|
|
New in this release:
* Merged Bandwidth Meter and Layouts toolwindows into the main menu dock area so that they can be dragged into the same line as the menu. If you had these placed in a custom position, this change may reset them to their new default positions.
* Fixed a bug introduced in 3.0.7.0 that caused automation rules to post an erroneous "Unable to MOVE headers to subfolder" error message.
* Added an alternate article grouping algorithm that groups articles based on the number of matching characters in the first nnn characters of the subject. This is a simpler grouping mechanism and can be used for Workgroups containing articles that won't group properly using the standard method. For this grouping method, grouping threshold is "matching percentage". The Sender must also match.
* Modified the time between checks for updates from 30 days to 14 days.
Regards |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BZB Expert

Joined: 26 Apr 2005 Posts: 1387
|
Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2012 9:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I've experienced some periods of CPU usage hitting off the roof, and some increasing memory usage, particularly when downloading/saving out of the db. Can you check if it's a memory leak? The mem/cpu usage on 3062 seems to be quite a bit less for the NMP executable. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
administrator Developer


Joined: 24 Jul 2004 Posts: 4750 Location: King William, VA
|
Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2012 11:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
What OS are you using?
Regards |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BZB Expert

Joined: 26 Apr 2005 Posts: 1387
|
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2012 12:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
| administrator wrote: | What OS are you using?
Regards |
Win 7 64bit |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
administrator Developer


Joined: 24 Jul 2004 Posts: 4750 Location: King William, VA
|
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2012 12:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
OK. I'm not seeing any memory differences on Vista. However, there are several new Win7 features that are only loaded when Win7 is detected. That may be where the new memory usage is coming from. As far as a leak goes, I have this version running 24/7 and haven't seen any memory leaks at all. I typically see between 50 and 200MB, with the higher end being when headers are getting processed. Memory always drops back down though, over time.
The only change that I can think of in the binary download process is the change to the unrar process, but it was very minor. If that was where the leak was I should see it too as I don't have "Overwrite existing files" enabled.
I'll keep an eye on mine, but if you could make sure there is no other change to your system that may be affecting memory or CPU, like a change to your antivirus, that would help. Any additional data you can gather may help as well.
Regards |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BZB Expert

Joined: 26 Apr 2005 Posts: 1387
|
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2012 1:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I'll keep an eye on it and see if I can pin it down to something more definite. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
haraldh Experienced

Joined: 12 Jun 2005 Posts: 124
|
Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 11:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
i downloaded the latest beta 3.0.7.1 yesterday.
i just wanted to applaud the new taskbar feature that allows to pause and resume a download. a really good idea! well done.
i am also using win7 x64 but - so far - i am not seeing any memory issues or high cpu usages. will report when i do. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
administrator Developer


Joined: 24 Jul 2004 Posts: 4750 Location: King William, VA
|
Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 1:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Just a followup:
I've run this beta under a memory checker (two actually) and there were no new memory leaks found. There are a couple of "leaks" that have been around for a very long time, but they are quite small and may be misreported as they are objects that cache their own memory space (like the in-memory queue cache).
Regards |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PorcPuff Expert


Joined: 17 Jul 2004 Posts: 302 Location: England, UK
|
Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2012 2:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nice to see it's still being worked on after this many years. It must be due a big birthday soon
I've got just one quick request - the scheduler is supposed to check the watch-folder for new files every minute, but sometimes, if you have woke the PC from hibernation or suspend mode, it will wait several minutes before processing new files.
Is there any tweaks you could make to any future betas to ensure it doesn't miss any checks? It's been in all versions I can remember, but thought I'd mention it here as I see you're working on some new beta builds.
Cheers. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PorcPuff Expert


Joined: 17 Jul 2004 Posts: 302 Location: England, UK
|
Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2012 2:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Oh, and will keep an eye on the CPU usage / memory usage on this new beta to see if I get the same results as BZB. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
administrator Developer


Joined: 24 Jul 2004 Posts: 4750 Location: King William, VA
|
Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2012 4:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| PorcPuff wrote: | | the scheduler is supposed to check the watch-folder for new files every minute... |
The default is every 5 minutes. I'm guessing the timer starts at zero after resuming. There's a new command-line option to change the default from 5 minutes to whatever you want. Use that to change the setting to every minutes if you want:
Default
-schedulercycle:300000
Every minute
-schedulercycle:60000
Also, after resuming, many of NMP's worker threads may be CPU-cycle starved because the O/S is busy. Can't really do much about that, though you could raise NMP's overall system priority.
Regards |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PorcPuff Expert


Joined: 17 Jul 2004 Posts: 302 Location: England, UK
|
Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 8:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I'm surprised it was every 5 minutes - it always felt like it came round quicker than that. Thanks for the command line. I'll drop that in and test it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BZB Expert

Joined: 26 Apr 2005 Posts: 1387
|
Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 12:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| PorcPuff wrote: | | Oh, and will keep an eye on the CPU usage / memory usage on this new beta to see if I get the same results as BZB. |
I've not really been seeing this any more. I suspect it was due to a change in my AV components that have since been updated. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|